Protection from Vampire Attacks on Routing Protocol

Authors

  • Pushpalata D. Chandore PG Student, Dept. of Computer Science and Engg, JDCT, Indore, MP, Indore Author
  • Krishnakant Kishor 2HOD, Dept. of Computer Science and Engg, JDCT, Indore, MP, Indore Author

Keywords:

Denial of service, routing, security, ad-hoc networks, wireless networks, sensor networks

Abstract

In sensing and pervasive computing ad-hoc low-power wireless networks are an exciting research. Prior security work has first focused on denial of communication at the routing or levels of media access control. This paper examine resource depletion attacks at routing protocol layer, which disable networks by quickly draining node's battery power. These “Vampire” attacks are not specific to any particular protocol, but rather depend on the properties of many well known classes of routing protocols. We find that all examined protocols are affected to Vampire attacks ,which are destructing, hard to detect, and are easy to carry out using as few as one malicious insider sending only protocol compliant messages. In case of worst case, a single Vampire can increase network-wide energy usage by a factor of O(N), where N in the number of nodes of network. The methods we discuss to mitigate these types of attacks which includes a new proof-of- concept protocol that bounds the damage caused by Vampires during the packet forwarding phase.

References

[1] Imad Aad, Jean-Pierre Hubaux, and Edward W. Knightly, Denial of service resilience in ad hoc networks, MobiCom, 2004.

[2] Haowen Chan and Adrian Perrig, Security and privacy in sensor networks,Computer 36 (2003), no. 10.

[3] Jae-Hwan Chang and Leandros Tassiulas, Maximum lifetime routing inwireless sensor networks, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 12(2004), no. 4.

[4] Jing Deng, Richard Han, and Shivakant Mishra, Defending against path based DoS attacks in wireless sensor networks, ACM workshop on security of ad hoc and sensor networks, 2005.

[5] Sheetalkumar Doshi, Shweta Bhandare, and Timothy X. Brown, An on demand minimum energy routing protocol for a wireless ad hoc network,ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review 6(2002), no. 3.

[6] Sharon Goldberg, David Xiao, Eran Tromer, Boaz Barak, and Jennifer Rexford, Path-quality monitoring in the presence of adversaries, SIGMETRICS,2008.

[7] Mina Guirguis, Azer Bestavros, Ibrahim Matta, and Yuting Zhang,Reduction of quality (RoQ) attacks on Internet end-systems, INFOCOM,2005.

[8] Yih-Chun Hu, Adrian Perrig, and David B. Johnson, Ariadne: A secure on-demand routing protocol for ad hoc networks, MobiCom, 2002

[9] Packet leashes: A defense against wormhole attacks in wireless ad hoc networks, INFOCOM, 2003.

[10] Bryan Parno, Mark Luk, Evan Gaustad, and Adrian Perrig, Secure sensornetwork routing: A clean-slate approach, CoNEXT, 2006.

[11] David R. Raymond, Randy C. Marchany, Michael I. Brownfield, and Scott F. Midkiff, Effects of denial-of-sleep attacks on wireless sensor network MAC protocols, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 58 (2009), no. 1.

[12] David R. Raymond and Scott F. Midkiff, Denial-of- service in wireless sensor networks: Attacks and defenses, IEEE Pervasive Computing 7(2008), no. 1.

[13] Frank Stajano and Ross Anderson, The resurrecting duckling: security issues for ad-hoc wireless networks, International workshop on security protocols, 1999.

[14] Lakshminarayanan Subramanian, Randy H. Katz, Volker Roth, Scott Shenker, and Ion Stoica, Reliable broadcast in unknown fixed-identity networks, Annual ACM SIGACT-SIGOPS symposium on principles of distributed computing, 2005.

[15]

Downloads

Published

2015-08-30

How to Cite

Protection from Vampire Attacks on Routing Protocol. (2015). International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Management and Technology, 1(2), 1-10. https://ijarsmt.in/ijarsmt/article/view/4

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1-10 of 72

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.